|
Public Member Functions |
| | CRelevanceLevel () |
| | CRelevanceLevel (const string &inURL, double inRelevanceLevel) |
| | CRelevanceLevel (const CRelevanceLevel &inElement) |
| bool | input (istream &inStream) |
| bool | output (ostream &outStream) const |
| bool | outputHTML (ostream &outStream) const |
| string | getURL () const |
|
double | getRelevanceLevel () const |
|
void | setRelevanceLevel (const double inRelevanceLevel) |
|
void | adjustRelevanceLevel (const double inRelevanceLevel) |
|
void | divideRelevanceLevelBy (const double inDivisor) |
|
string | toXML () const |
What do you think, folx? I think, that the relevance level as it is, is too inflexible. We need to reflect a bit more what is given by MRML. to be FIXME d